Should I take a lower-paying APS role for better work-life balance with kids?

Paxnoota

New Member
Hi gents, I'm in a bit of a dilemma. I'm a PM at a private tech company (contracts), and leaders really like me — just got a massive project. I love my role, but it's a 45-min drive each way, no WFH, though hours are flexible bc we talk to clients internationally at odd times. Pay's good: $185k all in. But I've been selected for APS EL1, and after negotiating pay I'll likely get top range up to $165k incl super. That role has 2 days WFH. I have 3 kids — 2 in primary school, a toddler, and my eldest is on the spectrum. My wife works full time too. She's pushing me to take the APS for work-life balance. Tbh, I know it'll be an easy role for me, but idk — high-paced demanding role with more pay and draem projects, or a small agency EL1.3 with $20k less? Anyone been there? Cheers.
 
Same boat here! Went from $190 down to $160 – best decision ever. Less stress, way more flexibility. Way better mood at home overall. Screw the money, honestly. ✌️
 
Extra super – and you don’t have to take leave for Christmas shut down. It’s gonna be slower and less exciting... but you aren’t going to have contracts pulled on you. There is a reason everyone goes for gov jobs.
 
You’ll save more than you lose in wages by not traveling to work on the two days you work from home. (Time is money!)

You’ll never get that time back with your kids when they’re young. Once they hit sixteen, they won’t want much to do with you… then go for the big role.
 
You know, work life balance and family really are the winners here. Public service gigs usually come with perks like decent overtime rates, leave loading, and matched super contributions. Plus, honestly, you just can't put a price on working from home, skipping the commute, and watching the little ones grow up.
 
Back
Top